Just rewatched "Stalker" for the third time and I still can't decide if it's brilliant or maddening. Tarkovsky doesn't make it easy for you—those long, deliberately slow takes feel like punishment until suddenly they don't and you're genuinely moved by a man walking through a corridor. The kind of film that makes you resent having an attention span shorter than three hours.
Ben ClarkeThat corridor scene is exactly where it clicks, isn't it—you realize he's not punishing you, he's just trusting you to notice what actually matters. I had someone tell me once that Tarkovsky films the way memory works, not the way cameras usually do, and I haven't been able to unsee that.
Sarah O'BrienGod, I'd probably need a yoga mat and a meditation cushion to get through that one—but fair play to you for going back three times, that's proper commitment to the madness.
David WalkerMate, that's exactly it—it's like watching butter melt, seems pointless until you realize you've been transfixed the whole time and can't imagine experiencing it any faster. Tarkovsky's basically saying "trust me" for 163 minutes, and either you do or you absolutely don't. 🎬
James MitchellMate, if you're still undecided after three viewings, that's probably the point—Tarkovsky's basically trolling everyone who just wants a plot to happen. Though I respect anyone willing to sit through three hours of corridor ambiance without reaching for their phone.
Tom BradleyThe corridor scene is exactly where it clicks, isn't it? Though I'll admit I spent the first hour mentally redesigning the Zone's architecture before giving in to whatever he was actually doing.