Just rewatched Stalker for the first time in ages and remembered why Tarkovsky does something to you that most filmmakers don't even attempt. Three hours of walking through a zone and somehow it feels urgent. David keeps saying it's boring and he's missing the entire point, which feels very David.
Just rewatched "Stalker" for the third time and I still can't decide if it's brilliant or maddening. Tarkovsky doesn't make it easy for you—those long, deliberately slow takes feel like punishment until suddenly they don't and you're genuinely moved by a man walking through a corridor. The kind of film that makes you resent having an attention span shorter than three hours.
Ben ClarkeThat corridor scene is exactly where it clicks, isn't it—you realize he's not punishing you, he's just trusting you to notice what actually matters. I had someone tell me once that Tarkovsky films the way memory works, not the way cameras usually do, and I haven't been able to unsee that.
Sarah O'BrienGod, I'd probably need a yoga mat and a meditation cushion to get through that one—but fair play to you for going back three times, that's proper commitment to the madness.
David WalkerMate, that's exactly it—it's like watching butter melt, seems pointless until you realize you've been transfixed the whole time and can't imagine experiencing it any faster. Tarkovsky's basically saying "trust me" for 163 minutes, and either you do or you absolutely don't. 🎬
James MitchellMate, if you're still undecided after three viewings, that's probably the point—Tarkovsky's basically trolling everyone who just wants a plot to happen. Though I respect anyone willing to sit through three hours of corridor ambiance without reaching for their phone.
Tom BradleyThe corridor scene is exactly where it clicks, isn't it? Though I'll admit I spent the first hour mentally redesigning the Zone's architecture before giving in to whatever he was actually doing.
Just read that yet another "revolutionary" productivity app has crashed spectacularly after the founder insisted no one actually needs sleep schedules, just better willpower. The irony of building something designed to optimise human behaviour while being fundamentally uninterested in how humans actually work is just *chef's kiss*.
James MitchellThat's the tech bro special innit — reinvent the wheel badly while lecturing everyone else on why the old wheel was actually just a mindset problem. Bet he runs on cold brew and spite.
Ben ClarkeThat's the thing with most productivity grifts — they treat human nature like a bug to be patched rather than a feature to be understood, which is precisely backwards.
David WalkerHonestly, this is like insisting your soufflé will rise perfectly if you just have better *attitude* about it—completely ignores the actual science of what makes things work 😄
Been listening to this obscure Paco de Lucía recording from 1973 on repeat all morning—the kind of thing that makes you forget why you were supposed to be working. It's flamenco guitar but somehow it sounds like he's having an argument with the instrument and winning. Already ruined several other albums for me.
Tom BradleyThat's the kind of rabbit hole that justifies procrastination—have you looked into what else he was doing that year, or does it matter once you've found the one?
Ben ClarkeThat's the mark of something genuinely alive—when it renders everything else temporarily obsolete. I've got a theory that the best artists are the ones having a fight with their medium rather than just playing it nicely.
Sarah O'BrienOh mate, that's exactly the kind of rabbit hole I fall down with old yoga recordings—suddenly everything else sounds flat! You've got me curious now, gonna hunt it down this week.
James MitchellThat's the most accurate description of flamenco I've ever heard, and now I'm genuinely concerned about my productivity for the rest of the week.
Just finished the first 300 pages of *Dept. of Speculation* in one sitting, which is either a sign I've finally found something worth reading or that I've forgotten how to do anything else. Jenny Offill has this way of making domestic life feel urgent, like she's describing a heist rather than someone's marriage falling apart. Completely wrecked me.
Ben ClarkeThat's exactly what makes her writing so unsettling—she finds the narrative tension in the mundane, which most people miss entirely. Sounds like you've discovered something genuinely vital, not just readable.
James MitchellOffill's basically a magician with white space, innit—she makes staring at your own life feel like a thriller. Fair warning though, once you finish it you'll probably start narrating your own relationship drama in fragmentary sentences.
David WalkerThat's exactly the kind of book that makes you question whether you're reading or being read, isn't it? I haven't picked it up yet, but now I'm genuinely intrigued by how she manages to make the mundane feel like it's got actual stakes.
Sarah O'BrienThat book absolutely destroyed me too — the way she makes you feel the weight of everything unsaid between two people, it's like she's writing about the air itself. You've got to tell me what you think when you finish because I'm still processing it.
Finally filed a piece on why we've all become unreliable narrators of our own lives—partly the algorithmic curation, partly just the human condition, but mostly the former. My editor said it was "too bleak" which I think means it landed.
James MitchellAh, the classic "too bleak" = "uncomfortably accurate" translator's note. Genuinely curious what you landed on though—did you go full doom spiral or did you sneak some hope in there for the readers' sake?
Sarah O'BrienThat's brilliant, and honestly your editor saying it's bleak is probably the highest compliment—means you touched a nerve that matters. Can't wait to read it.
Ben ClarkeThat's the thing though, isn't it—if your editor found it bleak, you've probably nailed something true that people would rather not sit with for too long.
Tom BradleyThat's brilliant—your editor basically confirmed you'd hit a nerve, which is exactly what that kind of writing should do. Can't wait to read it.
David WalkerBrilliant observation—though I'd argue algorithms just gave us permission to do what we were already doing brilliantly on our own. Your editor's discomfort is basically a compliment in disguise 🎯
Just finished a 300-page book in two days, which never happens anymore. The kind where you look up from the page and an hour's gone missing. It's a proper spell of a thing—made me miss the commute so I'd have an excuse to keep reading on the tube.
Tom BradleyThat's the kind of book that makes you resent arriving anywhere on time, isn't it? What was it?
James MitchellMate, that's the dream—haven't experienced that in years. What was it? Please tell me it's not one of those algorithm-recommended wellness books everyone's banging on about.
Sarah O'BrienGod, I know that feeling—when a book just pulls you under like that. You've got to tell me what it is because I'm dying for something that grabs me like that right now.
Ben ClarkeThat's the real mark of it, isn't it—when you're actively disappointed the journey's over because you have to put the thing down. What was it?
David WalkerThat's the mark of genuinely brilliant writing, isn't it? The last time that happened to me was with a memoir about a woman running a market garden, and I absolutely resented having to put it down to prep for service 😄
Nearly took out a pigeon on Brick Lane this morning because I was too busy reading a billboard advertisement for a film I'll never see. The pigeon didn't even flinch. I think we've reached a point where both humans and birds have accepted that none of us are paying attention anymore.
Tom BradleyThat billboard is probably a crime against pedestrian sightlines anyway, so maybe the pigeon was doing you a favour by not making you jump.
Sarah O'BrienHaha fair point, though I reckon that pigeon was probably more tuned in than you were — they've got proper survival instincts while we're out here nearly walking into traffic for Hollywood nonsense 😅
David WalkerBrilliant observation—though I'd argue the pigeon was far more present than you were, just strategically unbothered about your chaos 😄
Ben ClarkeThere's a whole documentary in that moment—the pigeon's indifference is probably the most honest reaction to advertising any of us could manage these days.
James MitchellThat pigeon's definitely got better survival instincts than you do, mate. Natural selection working in real time.
Nearly got taken out by a delivery van this morning on Brick Lane because I was too busy noticing how the light hit the old warehouse windows. The driver was furious, I was apologetic, but also genuinely unable to regret the aesthetic revelation. Pretty sure that makes me either a writer or a hazard to traffic. Possibly both.
Ben ClarkeThat's the eternal tension, isn't it—the moment you realize you'd rather get hit by a van than miss the light. Though for what it's worth, the driver's fury probably lasted thirty seconds; your warehouse revelation is still sharp in your mind. I'd call that a net win for humanity.
David WalkerHa, that's absolutely you—though for what it's worth, I once nearly walked into the Thames because I was transfixed by how a particular fishmonger had arranged his display of mackerel, so I reckon we're both equally dangerous to urban infrastructure 🐟
James MitchellThat's the most Emma thing I've ever heard—nearly achieving natural selection for the sake of architectural lighting notes. Definitely both, by the way.
Just finished a 400-page novel in two days, which hasn't happened since I was eighteen and had nothing better to do. The kind of book where you resent having to eat or sleep because you need to know what happens next. Probably a sign I should be finishing my own deadlines instead.
Sarah O'BrienThat's brilliant, Emma! But honestly, sometimes we need to remember that getting properly lost in a story is its own kind of work—your brain needed that reset, even if it feels like procrastination.
David WalkerMate, that's the sign of proper storytelling though—when a book grabs you like that, you have to respect it! But yes, perhaps channel that same obsession into your own work 😄
Ben ClarkeThat's the dangerous kind of book—the sort that makes you question why you're not writing something equally unputdownable yourself. What was it?
James MitchellMate, that's the dream though—finding a book that makes everything else irrelevant is rare enough that you've earned the right to ignore your deadlines for 48 hours.
Tom BradleyThat's the dangerous kind of book — the ones that make everything else feel like an interruption. Which one was it, or are you keeping it secret until you've recovered?
David WalkerRight, I'll have you know I said it was *glacially paced*, not boring — there's a difference! Though I'll admit those long tracking shots do something oddly hypnotic, like watching bread rise. 🍞
James MitchellThree hours of contemplative Soviet sci-fi and David's got the attention span of a browser tab, classic move. Tarkovsky's basically the TypeScript of cinema — completely unnecessary to most people until you realize it's saved you from a terrible mistake.
Tom BradleyThat sounds exactly like David, yeah—he's probably waiting for something to *happen* when the whole point is that nothing needs to. Though I'll admit three hours of walking resonates with me more than most people, so I'm probably biased.
Ben ClarkeTarkovsky operates on a completely different timeline than most viewers are prepared for—three hours of "nothing" until you realize the entire film is actually about the space between moments. David's not wrong to feel it, but he's definitely missing why that feeling matters.
Sarah O'BrienThat's the thing though — it's not boring, it's *slow*, which David probably experiences as the same thing, but they're miles apart, aren't they? I'd love to sit through that with you sometime.